Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube
  • News
    • Campus
    • Local
    • World
  • Arts and Entertainment
    • Performing Arts
    • Visual Arts
    • Music
    • Film
    • Fashion
  • Lifestyle
    • Campus Happenings
    • Community Happenings
    • Food
    • Business
    • Travel
    • Calendar
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Video
    • Globe News
    • What’s Bruin
    • Bruin Lens
    • Film
    • Music
    • Globe Shorts
  • Radio
Search
66.8 F
Salt Lake City
Saturday, September 20, 2025
  • Newsletter Signup
  • Contests
  • About The Globe
    • Staff
    • Jobs
    • Issue PDFs
Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube
Sign in
Welcome! Log into your account
Forgot your password? Get help
Privacy Policy
Password recovery
Recover your password
A password will be e-mailed to you.
The Globe The Globe
The Globe The Globe
  • News
    • Campus
    • Local
    • World
  • Arts and Entertainment
    • Performing Arts
    • Visual Arts
    • Music
    • Film
    • Fashion
  • Lifestyle
    • Campus Happenings
    • Community Happenings
    • Food
    • Business
    • Travel
    • Calendar
  • Opinion
  • Sports
  • Video
    • Globe News
    • What’s Bruin
    • Bruin Lens
    • Film
    • Music
    • Globe Shorts
  • Radio
Home Arts and Entertainment Movie review: ‘You’re Next’ a badly written showcase of mediocre gore effects
  • Arts and Entertainment
  • Don't Miss
  • Film

Movie review: ‘You’re Next’ a badly written showcase of mediocre gore effects

By
Stephen Romney
-
August 21, 2013
0
Still from You're Next featuring Sharni Vinson.
Sharni Vinson's character had the potential to become the next Laurie Strode, but the film instead turned her into a Mary Sue. (Courtesy of Lionsgate)

Horror films are the cheapest yet riskiest film a studio can invest in. While most of the underperforming horror films are usually bland and mediocre at best, every once in a while, you come across a film that fails in so many ways that you’re not sure where to begin.

Review Score: 1/5

The premise of “You’re Next” is as follows. A group of unknown actors have a family reunion in the modern day equivalent of a cabin in the woods, only to have a group of animal-mask-wearing psychopaths proceed to systematically kill them off while the characters bumble around following even the most out-dated clichés possible.

The first problem with the film is that there is little to no character development.

We’re just introduced to what looks like a completely dysfunctional family and are suddenly expected to care about them when the killing starts even though we’re given no reason to.

While clichés are prevalent in horror films, this film somehow finds a way to use so many clichés within the first few minutes that it stops being even laughably bad and instead feels like there was no sense of originality.

As the film progresses, we’re then bombarded with plot twists and revelations that are supposed to be surprising, but aren’t given how little we know about the characters.

All the various twists just accomplish the task of making the characters unlikable and unrelatable.

The film then devolves into a laughable excuse for a send up to the ‘80’s slasher films, complete with cheesy synthesizer music and the repeated use of the one professionally produced song they got the licensing for.

Couple that with the fact that film also devolves into a showcase of gore effects that even the ‘80s would be ashamed of, and the audience’s suspension of disbelief is not so much broken, but rather stuffed into a sack, repeatedly hit against the wall, poured out, smashed with a hammer, with the powdery contents remaining being sliced into lines and then snorted by the film’s producers.

After all of that, the film then has the gall to try to treat itself as a satire and send-up to classic horror films, expecting the viewer to forget that it was trying to be taken seriously at the start of the film.

Overall, this film feels very amateurish in terms of writing, pacing, and effects, as we’re given a hastily delivered, yet convoluted plot with no sense of foreshadowing or character development that isn’t even sure what kind of film it’s supposed to be.

It doesn’t even boast value as a laughably bad movie, as even the kills and gore are mediocre at best.

This film isn’t worth renting on Netflix or even from a public library. It comes across as a badly produced independent film that should have died off in the festival circuit as opposed to being released theatrically. On my personal scale, I give “You’re Next” a 1/5. Do. Not. See. This. Movie.

  • TAGS
  • horror movies
  • Movie Review
  • You're Next
Stephen Romney

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

Still image from "Mission Impossible 8"

Review: The final ‘Mission: Impossible’ is a poetic end to a long series

Butterflies flying around Roz the robot

Film review: ‘The Wild Robot’

Iman Vellani, Brie Larson, and Teyonah Parris in The Marvels (2023)

‘The Marvels’ entertains, but it won’t reignite the MCU

Oumaïma Barid in "Animalia"

‘Animalia’ review: A supernatural drama exploring our place in the universe

Robin Wright as Edee Holzer

Sundance film in review: ‘Land’

The Globe
ABOUT US
About The Globe
Staff
Jobs
Issue PDFs
FOLLOW US
Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube
  • About The Globe
  • Staff
  • Contact Us
  • Jobs
© 2025 The Globe